I would like to discuss a chapter
entitled "Introduction" from the book Universe of the Mind: A
Semiotic Theory of Culture. The book is originally written in Russian by Yuri
Lotman.
The chapter of Introduction that I
will be discussing here is written by Umberto Eco. It is an introduction to the
English translation of the book which is translated by Ann Shukman.
ð. ðððĒðĻð§ ð§ðð ððĻð§ððĒðĨ:
Umberto Eco was an Italian
medievalist, philosopher, semiotician, novelist, cultural critic, and political
and social commentator. In English, he is best known for his novels. Eco wrote
prolifically throughout his life, with his output including children's books,
translations from French and English. At the time of his death, he was an
Emeritus professor at the University of Bologna, where he taught for much of
his life. In the 21st century, he has continued to gain recognition for his
1995 essay "Ur-Fascism", where Eco lists fourteen general properties
he believes comprise fascist ideologies.
ðŪ. ðŠððð§ ððĶ ð§ðððĶ ððððĢð§ððĨ ðððĒðĻð§?
The chapter provides an overview of
the work of Yuri Lotman focusing on his contribution to semiotics and the
history of culture. Eco attempts to explain how Lotman, initially influenced by
structuralism, moved towards a more complex understanding of culture as a
system of codes and texts, ultimately developing the concept of Semiosphere as
a dynamic whole. The text explains how Lotman develop a more comprehensive
semiotic theory that views culture as a complex system of interconnected sign
systems, rather than just individual devices or codes. The chapter stresses on
Lotman’s interdisciplinary approach and his insightful analysis of cultural
typologies and concepts.
Eco states that two very important
intellectual movements erupted in European academia during sixties:
Semiotics/Semiology and Structuralism.
Eco also differentiates semiotics
from structuralism: Semiotics is the study of the entire range of sign systems
and communication processes, while structuralism is a method that has proven
useful for analyzing linguistic and cultural systems. He also notes that all
semioticians may not use structuralist method.
For Lotman, considering the whole
semiosphere as a single mechanism is necessary because understanding its
various aspects is only possible by viewing it as a unified entity, not just a
collection of individual parts.
ðŊ. ðððŽ ð§ððĨð ðĶ:
ðŊ.ð ðĶðēðšðķðžððķð°ð/ðĶðēðšðķðžðđðžðīð:
The study of signs and symbols and
their use or interpretation, encompassing the entire range of signs systems and
communication processes.
ðŊ.ðŪ ðĶððŋðð°ðððŋðŪðđðķððš:
A method of analysis that views
culture as analogous to language, emphasizing underlying structures and systems
of relations.
ðŊ.ðŊ ðĨððððķðŪðŧ ððžðŋðšðŪðđðķððš:
A school of literary criticism
originating in Russia in the late 1910s and 1920s, focusing on the formal
properties and “devices” of literary texts rather than their content or social
context.
ðŊ.ð° ððēððķð°ðē:
In formalism, a technique used by a
writer to produce a specific effect, such as defamiliarization.
ðŊ.ðą ððē-ðģðŪðšðķðđðķðŪðŋðķððŪððķðžðŧ:
A formalist concept referring to
the technique of presenting common things in an unfamiliar or strange way in
order to enhance perception and understanding.
ðŊ.ðē ðĢðŋðŪðīððē ðĶð°ðĩðžðžðđ:
A group of linguists and literary
theorists active in Prague during the 1920s and 1930s, known for their
contributions to structural linguistics and phonology.
ðŊ.ðģ ððŪðŧðīððē ðŪðŧðą ðĢðŪðŋðžðđðē:
A fundamental distinction in
Saussurean linguistics; ‘langue’ refers to the abstract language system or
code, while ‘parole’ refers to individual acts of speaking or writing messages.
ðŊ.ðī ððžðąðēð ðžðģ ð ðēðððŪðīðē:
Concepts derived from Information
Theory and Structuralism; the code is the system of rules or conventions, and
the message is the specific instance of communication encoded using that
system.
ðŊ.ðĩ ðĢðŋðķðšðŪðŋð ð ðžðąðēðđðđðķðŧðī ðĶððððēðš:
According to Lotman, the
fundamental system by which we apprehend the world, which is language.
ðŊ.ððŽ ðĶðēð°ðžðŧðąðŪðŋð ð ðžðąðēðđðđðķðŧðī ðĶððððēðš:
Other semiotic systems, such as
myth, cultural rules, religion, art, and science, which build upon and organize
the primary modelling system (language) to offer different ways of
understanding and talking about the world.
ðŊ.ðð ð§ðð―ðžðđðžðīð ðžðģ ðððđðððŋðē:
The study of different types of
classifications of cultures based on their underlying semiotic systems and
rules.
ðŊ.ððŪ ððŋðŪðšðšðŪððķð°ðŪðđ ððēðŪðŋðŧðķðŧðī:
A mode of learning a system (like
language or culture) by understanding its underlying rules and combining
discrete units according to those rules.
ðŊ.ððŊ ð§ðēð
ðððŪðđ ððēðŪðŋðŧðķðŧðī:
A mode of learning a system by
being exposed to and imitating exiting text (macro-units) from which rules can
eventually be inferred.
ðŊ.ðð° ðĶðēðšðķðžðð―ðĩðēðŋðē:
Lotman’s concept of the entire
semiotic space of a culture or continuum, within which various semiotic
processes occur. Analogous to the biosphere.
ðŊ.ððą ððŋðēðžðđðķððŪððķðžðŧ (ðððđðððŋðŪðđ):
The process of mixing different
cultural codes and systems, resulting in contrasts and hybrids.
ðŊ.ððē ðĶððŧð°ðĩðŋðžðŧðķð° ðð―ð―ðŋðžðŪð°ðĩ:
The analysis of a system (like
language or culture) at a specific point in time, without considering its
historical development.
That is all for today. Comment
which ideas you would like to explore in more details.
Comments
Post a Comment