Skip to main content

iReview: Three Functions of a Text

I would like to discuss first chapter entitled "Three Functions of a Text" from the book Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. The book is originally written in Russian by Yuri Lotman.

1. About the Author


Yuri Lotman (also Spelled as Juri Lotman, 28 February 1922 – 28 October 1993) was a prominent Russian-Estonian literary scholar, semiotician, and historian of Russian culture, who worked at the University of Tartu. He was a founder of the Tartu–Moscow Semiotic School. The present book from which the chapter is being discussed is one of the key works on his ideas of signs, semiotics, and culture.

2. What is this Chapter about?

The central argument of the chapter is that semiotic systems, particularly language and the texts they produce, have functions that extend far beyond the adequate transmission of a pre-existing message. The text identifies and elaborates on two additional, crucial functions: the generation of new meanings, identified as the creative function and the condensation of cultural memory.

2.1 Saussurean Model and its Limitations

The analysis begins by critiquing the traditional Saussurean linguistic model, which prioritizes the study of language defined as the abstract system, or code over speech its concrete manifestation, the text. Saussure identifies them as Langue and Parole respectively.

2.1.1 The "Packaging" Metaphor

Here, a text is treated as a disposable "packaging" for a message or content. The primary goal of communication is for the receiver to de-code the text and receive a message identical to the one sent. The text itself holds no intrinsic value beyond being a vehicle for this content.

2.1.2 The Ideal of Adequacy

The system is considered to work "well" if the received message is wholly identical to the despatched one. Any differences are classified as "errors" to be prevented by mechanisms like redundancy.

2.1.3 The Paradox of Natural Language

If perfect, adequate transmission is the primary criterion for success, then natural languages must be considered inefficient. Achieving absolute identity between transmitted and received messages requires the addresser and addressee to have wholly identical codes—a condition that is practically unobtainable. Differences in linguistic experience, memory, cultural tradition, and individual perspective ensure that the identity of transmitted and received texts is always relative.

2.1.4 Artificial Languages as the Model

To guarantee perfect adequacy, one would need an artificial, simplified language used by artificially simplified communicators with limited memory and no cultural background. While such systems perfectly model the function of adequate transmission, they lose the other essential functions inherent to natural language, most notably its universalism.

2.2 Generating New Meanings or The Creative Function

In direct contrast to the transmission model, the creative function posits that semiotic systems are also generators of new messages.

2.2.1 Defining a "New Message"

A "new message" is not one produced by a simple, symmetrical transformation where the original input can be perfectly recovered (e.g., solving a math problem). A new message arises from an asymmetrical transformation, where a reverse operation would not produce the original text but a third, different text.

2.2.2 Translation as a Creative Act

The translation of artistic texts is the primary example. The translation of a poem from one language to another is not a one-to-one transfer.

Example: Translating a Japanese Haiku into Gujarati may sometimes require a completely different poetic form, not a direct symmetrical transfer. The fact that multiple translations of the same poem can exist demonstrates that there is a "space" of possible interpretations rather than a single correct correspondence.

2.2.3 Accretion of Meaning

In creative transformations, meaning is not just an invariant element that is preserved; it is also what is altered. This process results in an accretion of meaning.

2.2.4 The Inseparability of Language and Content

In complex meaning-generation, language is inseparable from the content it expresses. The message becomes not just a message in a language, but also a message about the language. Roman Jakobson termed this phenomenon the "set to the code," a fundamental feature of literary texts.

2.3. Condensing Cultural Memory or the Memory Function

The text's third identified function is its capacity to act as a condenser of cultural memory.

2.3.1 The Text's Intrinsic Memory

A text is not a static object; it has the capacity to preserve the memory of its previous contexts. The sum of the contexts in which a text acquires interpretation can be termed the text's memory.

2.3.2 Accumulation of Information

Instead of fading over time, texts that remain culturally active demonstrate a capacity to accumulate information. They gain new meanings through their interactions with new contexts and new audiences.

Example: The novella Devdas today is not just Saratbabu's original Bengali work. It is also the memory of all its subsequent interpretations on stage and screen and in criticism. A modern audience cannot forget what has been learned since Saratbabu's time, and this knowledge gives the text new layers of meaning.

2.4. The Spectrum of Language: From Artificial to Artistic

The text proposes that all languages and texts can be situated along an axis defined by two abstract poles: The Artificial Pole, i.e. the pole characterized by the primary function of transmitting invariant messages. And the Artistic or Poetic Pole, the pole characterized by the dominance of the creative function.

2.4.1 A Moveable Position 

These poles are theoretical abstractions. No actual language is purely one or the other. Natural languages contain "poetic" elements like synonymity, and even the most individualistic artistic languages must contain metalingual elements, such as self-reflection on the code. Furthermore, a text's position on this axis is not fixed; it can be shifted by the perspective of the reader.

3. Key Terms

Accretion of Meaning:

The process by which a text gains new meaning through creative transformations, rather than simply preserving an invariant message.

Artificial Languages:

Simplified semiotic systems designed to fulfill one function to perfection: the adequate transmission of a message. They lack the universalism of natural language.

Artistic (Poetic) Languages:

Semiotic systems in which the creative function is strongest. They are characterized by asymmetrical transformations and the inseparability of language and content. For examples, the language of poetry, where a reverse translation would not produce the original text.

Asymmetrical Transformation:

A transformation of a text where a reverse operation does not lead back to the original input text, but rather to a new, third text. This is characteristic of creative acts. For example, the adaptation of a novel into a film.

Code:

The abstract system of rules for encoding and decoding a message. In Saussurean thought, this is analogous to language as opposed to speech or text. For example, the code for English includes its grammar and vocabulary, but also linguistic experience, memory, norms, and cultural traditions.

Creative Function:

The capacity of a semiotic system not only to transmit ready-made messages but also to serve as a generator of new ones through asymmetrical transformations. For examples, translating a poem, where the act creates a new text that is an interpretation of the original rather than an identical copy.

Iconism:

The presence of a non-arbitrary, motivated connection between the signifier (the sign's form) and the signified (the sign's concept). Jakobson identified this as a key feature of language, particularly its artistic aspect.

Memory Function:

The capacity of a text to act as a condenser of cultural memory, preserving the memory of its previous contexts and accumulating new information and meanings over time.

Set to the Code:

A term from Roman Jakobson describing a message in which the interest is shifted onto its own language, making the message not just in a language but also about that language. This is a fundamental feature of literary texts.

Symmetrical Transformation:

A transformation of a text that is fully reversible, where an inverse operation can perfectly restore the original input. This does not create a "new message."

Text:

The concrete, articulated manifestation of language (or a code), as opposed to the abstract system itself. The material object of semiotic analysis. Examples include poems, novels, advertisements, films, etc.

Text's Memory:

The sum of the contexts in which a given text acquires interpretation. These contexts are, in a way, incorporated into the text, giving it a "semiotic life." For example, Hamlet today is not just the play but also "the memory of all its interpretations" and the cultural associations it has accrued.

#Text #Function #Semiotics #Lotman #Saussure #CulturalSemiotics #iReview 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

āŠ—ુāŠœāŠ°ાāŠĪી āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪો : ‘āŠ•ંāŠ•ુ’, ‘āŠ­āŠĩāŠĻી āŠ­āŠĩાāŠˆ’ āŠ…āŠĻે ‘āŠ§ાāŠĄ’āŠĻા āŠļંāŠĶāŠ°્āŠ­ે

  āŠ†āŠŪ āŠœોāŠˆāŠ āŠĪો āŠ—ુāŠœāŠ°ાāŠĪી āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ āŠ‡āŠĻ્āŠĄāŠļ્āŠŸ્āŠ°ી āŠ–ૂāŠŽ āŠœૂāŠĻી āŠ›ે āŠ…āŠĻે āŠ•ેāŠŸāŠēાāŠŊ āŠŪāŠđāŠĪ્āŠĩāŠĻા āŠ•āŠēાāŠ•ાāŠ°ો āŠ…āŠĻે āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪો āŠ†āŠŠી āŠšૂāŠ•ી āŠ›ે. āŠŠāŠ°ંāŠĪુ āŠ†āŠœેāŠŊ āŠ āŠ°ાāŠ·્āŠŸ્āŠ°ીāŠŊ-āŠ†ંāŠĪāŠ°āŠ°ાāŠ·્āŠŸ્āŠ°ીāŠŊ āŠļ્āŠĪāŠ° āŠŠāŠ° āŠ–ૂāŠŽ āŠœ āŠŠાāŠ›āŠģ āŠĶેāŠ–ાāŠŊ āŠ›ે. āŠ…āŠđીં , āŠđું āŠĪ્āŠ°āŠĢ āŠ—ુāŠœāŠ°ાāŠĪી āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪો ‘ āŠ­āŠĩāŠĻી āŠ­āŠĩાāŠˆ ’ , ‘āŠ•ંāŠ•ુ ’ āŠ…āŠĻે ‘ āŠ§ાāŠĄ ’ āŠĩિāŠķે āŠĩાāŠĪ āŠ•āŠ°ીāŠķ, āŠ…āŠĻે āŠ—ુāŠœāŠ°ાāŠĪી āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪોāŠĻાં āŠŠāŠŸ āŠŠāŠ° āŠĪેāŠŪāŠĻાં āŠŪāŠđāŠĪ્āŠĩ āŠĩિāŠķે āŠĩાāŠĪ āŠ•āŠ°āŠĩાāŠĻો āŠĻાāŠĻāŠ•āŠĄો āŠŠ્āŠ°āŠŊાāŠļ āŠ•āŠ°ીāŠķ. āŠ­āŠĩāŠĻી āŠ­āŠĩાāŠˆ (āŦ§āŦŊāŦŪāŦĶ) āŠ•ેāŠĪāŠĻ āŠŪāŠđેāŠĪા āŠĶ્āŠĩાāŠ°ા āŠĶિāŠ—્āŠĶāŠ°્āŠķિāŠĪ āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ ‘ āŠ­āŠĩāŠĻી āŠ­āŠĩાāŠˆ ’ āŦ§āŦŊāŦŪāŦĶāŠŪાં āŠŠ્āŠ°āŠĶāŠ°્āŠķિāŠĪ āŠĨāŠˆ āŠđāŠĪી āŠœે āŠ§ીāŠ°ુāŠŽāŠđેāŠĻ āŠŠāŠŸેāŠēāŠĻા āŠĻાāŠŸāŠ• āŠŠāŠ° āŠ†āŠ§ાāŠ°િāŠĪ āŠđāŠĪી , āŠ…āŠĻે āŠœાāŠĪિāŠĩાāŠĶāŠĻા āŠŪુāŠĶ્āŠĶા āŠĩિāŠķે āŠ–ૂāŠŽ āŠœ āŠ°āŠļāŠŠ્āŠ°āŠĶ āŠ°ીāŠĪે āŠĩાāŠĪ āŠ•āŠ°ે āŠ›ે. āŠ† āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪāŠĻે āŠ°ાāŠ·્āŠŸ્āŠ°ીāŠŊ āŠ…āŠĻે āŠ†ંāŠĪāŠ°āŠ°ાāŠ·્āŠŸ્āŠ°ીāŠŊ āŠļ્āŠĪāŠ° āŠŠāŠ° āŠ–્āŠŊાāŠĪિ āŠŠ્āŠ°ાāŠŠ્āŠĪ āŠĨāŠˆ āŠ›ે. āŠŪાāŠ°ા āŠŪાāŠŸે āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪāŠĻું āŠļāŠđુāŠĨી āŠŪāŠđāŠĪ્āŠĩāŠĻું āŠĶૃāŠķ્āŠŊ āŠķāŠ°ૂāŠ†āŠĪāŠĻી āŦŽ āŠļેāŠ•āŠĻ્āŠĄ્āŠļāŠŪાં āŠœ āŠœોāŠĩા āŠŪāŠģે āŠ›ે; āŠ āŠ•āŠđે āŠ›ે, āŠ…āŠļાāŠˆāŠĪ āŠ ાāŠ•ોāŠ° āŠ…āŠĻે āŠŽેāŠ°્āŠĪોāŠē āŠŽ્āŠ°ેāŠ–્āŠĪāŠĻે āŠļāŠŪāŠ°્āŠŠિāŠĪ. āŠ† āŠāŠ• āŠŦ્āŠ°ેāŠŪ āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪāŠĻે āŠ—ુāŠœāŠ°ાāŠĪી āŠ…āŠĻે āŠĩૈāŠķ્āŠĩિāŠ• āŠĻાāŠŸ્āŠŊāŠŠāŠ°ંāŠŠāŠ°ા āŠļાāŠĨે āŠœોāŠĄી āŠ†āŠŠે āŠ›ે. ‘āŠ­āŠĩāŠĻી āŠ­āŠĩાāŠˆ’ (āŠĶિ. āŠŪāŠđેāŠĪા , āŦ§āŦŊāŦŪāŦĶ)       āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ āŠŠોāŠĪાāŠĻી āŠĩાāŠĪ āŠ•āŠđેāŠĩાāŠŪાં āŠ­āŠĩાāŠˆ āŠĻાāŠŸ્āŠŊāŠŠāŠ°ંāŠŠāŠ°ાāŠĻો āŠ‰āŠŠāŠŊોāŠ— āŠ•āŠ°ે āŠ›ે, āŠ…āŠĻે āŠāŠ• āŠĻāŠĩી āŠœ āŠĻેāŠ°ેāŠŸીāŠĩ āŠŠāŠĶ્āŠ§āŠĪિ...

"āŠ§ુāŠģāŠ•ી āŠĪાāŠ°ી āŠŪાāŠŊા āŠēાāŠ—ી": āŠāŠ• āŠ…āŠĩāŠēોāŠ•āŠĻ

āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ “ āŠ§ુāŠģāŠ•ી āŠĪાāŠ°ી āŠŪાāŠŊા āŠēાāŠ—ી ” āŠ°ાāŠ āŠĩા āŠļāŠŪાāŠœāŠĻી āŠāŠ• āŠŊુāŠĩāŠĪી , āŠ§ુāŠģāŠ•ી , āŠĻી āŠĩાāŠĪ āŠ•āŠ°ે āŠ›ે . āŠ† āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ ‘ āŠ°ાāŠ  ’ āŠĩિāŠļ્āŠĪાāŠ° āŠĪāŠ°ીāŠ•ે āŠ“āŠģāŠ–āŠĪા āŠ›ોāŠŸાāŠ‰āŠĶેāŠŠુāŠ° , āŠŠાāŠĩીāŠœેāŠĪāŠŠુāŠ° , āŠĻāŠļāŠĩાāŠĄી , āŠŽોāŠĄેāŠēી , āŠĩāŠ—ેāŠ°ે āŠœેāŠĩા āŠ—ાāŠŪāŠĄાંāŠ“āŠŪાં āŠ–ૂāŠŽ āŠļāŠŦāŠģ āŠĨāŠ‡ āŠđāŠĪી . āŠ† āŠĩિāŠļ્āŠĪાāŠ°āŠĻા āŠļિāŠĻેāŠŪાāŠ˜āŠ°ોāŠŪાં , āŠœ્āŠŊાં āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ āŠŦāŠ•્āŠĪ āŠĪ્āŠ°āŠĢ āŠĶિāŠĩāŠļ āŠšાāŠēāŠĪી , āŠ† āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ āŠŪāŠđિāŠĻાāŠ“ āŠļુāŠ§ી āŠšાāŠēી . āŠŠāŠ°ંāŠĪુ , āŠŪાāŠ°ા āŠ•ેāŠŸāŠēાāŠ• āŠŪાāŠđિāŠĪીāŠĶાāŠĪાāŠ“āŠĻા āŠŪāŠĪ āŠ…āŠĻુāŠļાāŠ° āŠ† āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ āŠ°ાāŠ āŠĩા āŠļāŠŪાāŠœ āŠĩિāŠ·ે āŠĻ āŠđāŠĪી . āŠĪો āŠŠāŠ›ી āŠ† āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ āŠ•ેāŠŸāŠēાāŠ• āŠšોāŠ•્āŠ•āŠļ āŠĩિāŠļ્āŠĪાāŠ°ોāŠŪાં āŠœ āŠ†āŠŸāŠēી āŠļāŠŦāŠģ āŠ•ેāŠŪ āŠĨāŠ‡ ? āŠŠ્āŠ°āŠļ્āŠĪુāŠĪ āŠŠેāŠŠāŠ° āŠāŠĻા āŠ•ેāŠŸāŠēાāŠ• āŠ•ાāŠ°āŠĢો āŠĩિāŠ·ે āŠĩાāŠĪ āŠ•āŠ°āŠķે , āŠ…āŠĻે āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪāŠŪાં ‘ āŠ°ાāŠ āŠĩા ’ āŠ“āŠģāŠ– āŠ•āŠˆ āŠ°ીāŠĪે āŠ‰āŠ­ી āŠ•āŠ°āŠĩાāŠŪાં āŠ†āŠĩી āŠ›ે āŠĪેāŠĻા āŠĩિāŠ·ે āŠĩાāŠĪ āŠ•āŠ°āŠķે . āŠļાāŠŪાāŠœીāŠ• āŠ°ીāŠĪે āŠŠāŠ›ાāŠĪ āŠĩāŠ°્āŠ—āŠĻી āŠ‰āŠŠāŠēા āŠĩāŠ°્āŠ— āŠĪāŠ°āŠŦāŠĻી āŠ—āŠĪિ āŠœે āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪāŠĻી āŠŪુāŠ–્āŠŊ āŠ•āŠĨાāŠĻો āŠ—āŠ°્āŠ­ીāŠĪાāŠ°્āŠĨ āŠ›ે , āŠœે āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪāŠĻું āŠ…āŠĻ્āŠŊ āŠŠાāŠļુ āŠ°āŠœુ āŠ•āŠ°ે āŠ›ે . āŠĪāŠĶુāŠŠāŠ°ાંāŠĪ , āŠ†āŠŠāŠĢે āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪ āŠ…āŠĻે āŠļāŠŪાāŠœāŠŪાં āŠŠ્āŠ°āŠļ્āŠĨાāŠŠિāŠĪ āŠŪાāŠēીāŠ•્āŠĩāŠ°્āŠ— āŠ…āŠĻે āŠŠીāŠĄીāŠĪāŠĩāŠ°્āŠ— āŠĩāŠš્āŠšેāŠĻા āŠŠાāŠ°āŠļ્āŠŠāŠ°િāŠ• āŠļંāŠŽંāŠ§ોāŠĻે āŠŠāŠĢ āŠœોāŠˆāŠķું . ***                 āŠŪાāŠĢāŠļ āŠļāŠđુāŠĨી āŠŠāŠđેāŠēા āŠāŠ• āŠŪાāŠĢāŠļ āŠ›ે , āŠ§āŠ°્āŠŪ , āŠœાāŠĪિ , āŠĩંāŠķ , āŠŽāŠ§ું āŠœ āŠĪેāŠĻી āŠŪાāŠĻāŠĩāŠĪા āŠ…āŠĻે āŠŪાāŠĻāŠĩāŠ§āŠ°્āŠŪ āŠļાāŠŪે āŠ—ૌāŠĢ āŠ›ે . āŠ†āŠĩો āŠļāŠ°āŠļ āŠļંāŠĶેāŠķો āŠ°āŠœુ āŠ•āŠ°āŠĪી...

āŠ°ોāŠēાં āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨ: āŠļંāŠ•ેāŠĪ āŠ…āŠĻે āŠŠ્āŠ°āŠĪિāŠŽāŠĶ્āŠ§āŠĪા

* āŠāŠŪ.āŠ.āŠĻા āŠ…āŠ­્āŠŊાāŠļ āŠĶāŠ°āŠŪિāŠŊાāŠĻ āŠœાāŠđેāŠ°ાāŠĪ āŠŠāŠ° āŠķોāŠ§āŠĻિāŠŽંāŠ§ āŠ•āŠ°āŠĪો āŠđāŠĪો āŠĪ્āŠŊાāŠ°ે āŠŪાāŠ°ા āŠķિāŠ•્āŠ·āŠ• āŠĪેāŠŪāŠœ āŠŪાāŠ°્āŠ—āŠĶāŠ°્āŠķāŠ• āŠ…āŠœāŠŊ āŠļāŠ°āŠĩૈāŠŊાāŠ āŠŪāŠĻે āŠ°ોāŠēાં āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨ (Roland Barthes) āŠĻું Mythologies āŠŠુāŠļ્āŠĪāŠ• āŠļૂāŠšāŠĩ્āŠŊું, āŠ…āŠĻે āŠĪ્āŠŊાāŠ°āŠĨી āŠķāŠ°ુ āŠĨāŠŊો āŠŪાāŠ°ો āŠ°ોāŠēાં āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨ āŠļાāŠĨેāŠĻો āŠļંāŠŽંāŠ§. āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨāŠĻું āŠļંāŠ•ેāŠĪāŠĩિāŠœ્āŠžાāŠĻ āŠŠāŠ°āŠĻું āŠ•ાāŠŪ āŠŪાāŠ°ા āŠ°āŠļāŠĻો āŠĩિāŠ·āŠŊ āŠđāŠĪું, āŠœે āŠ†āŠ—āŠģ āŠœāŠĪાં āŠŪાāŠ°ાં āŠŽીāŠœાં āŠļંāŠķોāŠ§āŠĻāŠŪાં āŠŠāŠĢ āŠ–ૂāŠŽ āŠœ āŠ‰āŠŠāŠŊોāŠ—ી āŠĻીāŠĩāŠĄ્āŠŊું. āŠ†āŠœે āŠŠāŠĢ āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨāŠĻું āŠ•ાāŠŪ āŠĩિāŠĩિāŠ§ āŠĩિāŠĶ્āŠŊાāŠķાāŠ–ાāŠ“ āŠ…āŠĻે āŠ…āŠ­્āŠŊાāŠļીāŠ“ āŠŪાāŠŸે āŠ–ૂāŠŽ āŠœ āŠŪāŠđāŠĪ્āŠĪ્āŠĩāŠŠૂāŠ°્āŠĢ āŠ›ે. āŠ…āŠĒāŠģāŠ• āŠēāŠ–ાāŠĢ āŠĪેāŠŪāŠœ āŠŠ્āŠ°āŠ­ાāŠĩ āŠ›āŠĪાં āŠŠāŠĢ “āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨીāŠŊāŠĻ” āŠ•āŠđેāŠĩાāŠĪા āŠ…āŠ­્āŠŊાāŠļીāŠ“ āŠ•ે āŠķાāŠ–ા āŠœāŠĻ્āŠŪી āŠĻāŠĨી. āŠāŠĻું āŠāŠ• āŠŪુāŠ–્āŠŊ āŠ•ાāŠ°āŠĢ āŠ›ે āŠ•ે āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨ āŠ…āŠēāŠ—-āŠ…āŠēāŠ— āŠ…āŠ­્āŠŊાāŠļુāŠ“ āŠŪાāŠŸે āŠ…āŠēāŠ—-āŠ…āŠēāŠ— āŠ…āŠ°્āŠĨ āŠ§āŠ°ાāŠĩે āŠ›ે, āŠ˜āŠĢા āŠŪાāŠŸે āŠ āŠļંāŠ°āŠšāŠĻાāŠĩાāŠĶી āŠļંāŠ•ેāŠĪ-āŠĩિāŠœ્āŠžાāŠĻી āŠ›ે, āŠĪો āŠ˜āŠĢા āŠŪાāŠŸે āŠ āŠ…āŠĻુ-āŠ†āŠ§ુāŠĻિāŠ•āŠĪાāŠĩાāŠĶી āŠ›ે. āŠāŠŪāŠĻું āŠ•ાāŠŪ āŠŦેāŠķāŠĻāŠĻી āŠŸેāŠ—-āŠēાāŠˆāŠĻāŠĨી āŠēāŠˆ āŠ•્āŠēાāŠļિāŠ•āŠē āŠļાāŠđિāŠĪ્āŠŊ āŠļુāŠ§ી āŠĩિāŠļ્āŠĪāŠ°ેāŠē āŠ›ે. āŠŽાāŠ°્āŠĨāŠĻા āŠēેāŠ–āŠĻāŠĻું āŠĩિāŠ·āŠŊāŠĩāŠļ્āŠĪુ āŠāŠĻા āŠļāŠŪāŠŊ āŠŠ્āŠ°āŠŪાāŠĢે āŠ–ૂāŠŽ āŠœ āŠ†āŠ§ુāŠĻિāŠ• āŠ…āŠĻે āŠ…āŠēāŠ— āŠđāŠĪું. āŠāŠŪāŠĢે āŠŦોāŠŸોāŠ—્āŠ°ાāŠŦીāŠĨી āŠēāŠˆ āŠŦિāŠē્āŠŪો āŠŠāŠ° āŠŠāŠĢ āŠēāŠ–્āŠŊું; āŠ°ેāŠļāŠēિંāŠ— āŠŦાāŠˆāŠŸāŠĨી āŠēāŠˆ āŠ•્āŠēાāŠļિāŠ•āŠē āŠĄ્āŠ°ાāŠŪા, āŠœાāŠđેāŠ°ાāŠĪ, āŠ°ાāŠœāŠ•ાāŠ°āŠĢ, āŠŠેāŠ°ીāŠļ, āŠ†āŠ‡āŠĻ્āŠļ્āŠŸાāŠ‡āŠĻāŠĻું āŠŪāŠ—āŠœ, āŠĩāŠ—ેāŠ°ે. āŠāŠŪāŠĻા āŠ•ાāŠŪāŠŪાં āŠļંāŠ•ેāŠĪāŠĩિāŠœ્āŠžાāŠĻāŠĻા āŠļિāŠĶ્āŠ§ાંāŠĪ, āŠļાāŠđિāŠĪ્āŠŊિāŠ• āŠĩિāŠĩેāŠšāŠĻ, āŠ‡āŠĪિāŠđાāŠļāŠĻે āŠēāŠ—āŠĪું āŠēેāŠ–āŠĻ, āŠŪāŠĻોāŠĩૈāŠœ્āŠžાāŠĻિ...