Skip to main content

iReview: Theories by Pramod K. Nayar

Hello dear Colleague and Fellow Researcher.


Today, I would like to discuss a chapter entitled "Theories" from the book An Introduction to Cultural Studies written by Pramod K. Nayar.

Prof. Pramod Nayar

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S):

Pramod K. Nayar is a professor of English and Cultural studies. He holds UNESCO Chair in Vulnerability Studies, at the Department of English, University of Hyderabad. He has written extensively on Cultural Studies, Popular Culture, Posthumanism, and Postcolonial studies. You can learn more about him at https://sites.google.com/site/pramodknayar/Home?authuser=0  

WHAT IS THIS CHAPTER ABOUT?

This chapter outlines various theoretical frameworks used within the field of cultural studies. It systematically presents key theories, such as structuralism, poststructuralism and deconstruction, Marxism, postmodernism, feminism and post-feminisms, postcolonial theory, technoculture and risk, and posthumanism, exploring their core concepts and applications in cultural analysis. Structuralism, poststructuralism, and Marxism are explained, focusing on how they analyse power dynamics and cultural meaning-making. The text then explores feminist theory, queer theory, and postcolonial theory, examining how these perspectives challenge dominant narratives and inequalities. Finally, it introduces technoculture and risk and posthumanism, highlighting their relevance to understanding contemporary societal issues. Each theory is explained with examples, activities designed to illustrate key concepts. The overall purpose is to provide a foundational understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of cultural studies, demonstrating how these approaches contribute to analyses of power, identity, and meaning within various cultural contexts.

Chapter provides three foundational assumptions of structuralism as outlined by Saussure which are: 

1. Language is arbitrary, meaning there is no inherent link between words and meanings; 

2. Language is relational, with meaning arising from differences; 

3. Language is systematic, where language constitutes our world views and how we understand it.

Arbitrariness: The idea that there is no natural or inherent connection between a word and its meaning; meaning is derived by social convention.

Binary Oppositions: Pairs of opposing terms (e.g., cat/hat) that create meaning through their differences and interrelationships.

Signifier: The word or image, while the signified is the concept or meaning that is associated with it.

While discussing poststructuralism, chapter talks about the stability of the meaning. It argues that meaning is never stable but is a result of “différance,” or the endless deferral of meaning through difference. It says each signifier points to other signifiers and there is no stable endpoint.

Différance: A term coined by Derrida to describe the way meaning is created through both difference and deferral; meaning is always postponed or deferred.

Power and knowledge, as discussed in the chapter, are interwoven, and systems like law, religion and medicines are all seen as discourses used to define and control populations. Foucault suggests that power structures rely on knowledge to control and classify populations, with discourses producing ‘subjects’.

Discourse: Systems of knowledge and power that create ‘subjects’ and ways of seeing the world.

Power/Knowledge: The inseparable relationship between power and knowledge, where power creates knowledge and knowledge reinforces power.

‘Subaltern’ is discussed stating that the term is used to describe oppressed or marginalised groups. Referring to Spivak’s argument the chapter says that the subaltern cannot speak for themselves because they are prevented by the structures of power.

Subaltern: A term used by Spivak to describe groups that are marginalised and oppressed.

Discussing base and superstructure in Marxism, the chapter says that the economic base, that is the material means of production, influences the social superstructure, that is culture and society. Class membership is defined by one’s relationship to production, and unequal power relationships are naturalised by ideology.

Economic Base: The material means of production (e.g., factories, land, resources).

Hegemony: The dominance of one group or class over others, which is achieved through a combination of coercion and consent, and maintained through cultural institution and ideologies.

Ideology: A system of beliefs and ideas that naturalizes social and economic inequalities.

Social Superstructure: The cultural and social institutions, norms, and ideas (e.g., law, family, education) that are shaped by the economic base.

Lyotard defines metanarrative, as discussed in the chapter, as overarching explanations, or systems of knowledge, such as Marxism or religion, which attempt to account for all aspects of reality. He argues that postmodernism is characterised by a distrust of these totalising explanations.

Metanarrative: An overarching story or explanation that tries to explain all of reality. Postmodernism is characterised by a distrust of these totalising explanations.

Similarly, the concept of hyperreality is also discussed. Baudrillard suggests that in postmodern society, the distinction between the real and its representation has broken down and we live in a word of hyperreality. Simulation has taken over, creating models of reality that have become more real than the real itself.

Hyperreality: A condition in postmodern society where the distinction between reality and representation break down, and images or simulations are considered more “real” than the original.

While discussing about the tenets of feminism, chapter identifies patriarchal structures that seek to subordinate women’s lives and is a critique of the ways in which women are represented, particularly in the media. It argues that gender is a social construction, and therefore it must be explored and critiqued.

Queer Theory: A perspective that seeks to destabilize traditional understandings of sexual and gender identities, and to challenge the normativity of heterosexuality.

Postcolonial theory studies the influence of colonialism and the modes of representation through which colonial power was established. It also examines the legacy of colonialism and how these legacies inform global relations.

Postcolonialism: A critical perspective that analyses the effects of colonialism on the colonized and examines the legacies of imperialism.

As argued by Ulrich Beck, risk society generates risks which are correlated with technology. The risk society is driven by technology, with risks themselves becoming part of commerce, requiring solutions that generate further risks.

Technoculture and Risk: The study of the ways that technology and social/environmental risks interact, focusing on issues such as consumerism, surveillance, and anxiety.

Risk Society: The idea that modern society is defined by its engagement with manufactured risks, particularly once associated with technology.

Posthumanism: A critical project that challenges the idea of the human as a unique and superior species, seeking to reconceptualise its relation to technology and other life forms.


That is all for today. Comment which ideas you would like to explore in more details.

 

LIKE, SHARE, & FOLLOW

THANK YOU



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ગુજરાતી ફિલ્મો : ‘કંકુ’, ‘ભવની ભવાઈ’ અને ‘ધાડ’ના સંદર્ભે

  આમ જોઈએ તો ગુજરાતી ફિલ્મ ઇન્ડસ્ટ્રી ખૂબ જૂની છે અને કેટલાય મહત્વના કલાકારો અને ફિલ્મો આપી ચૂકી છે. પરંતુ આજેય એ રાષ્ટ્રીય-આંતરરાષ્ટ્રીય સ્તર પર ખૂબ જ પાછળ દેખાય છે. અહીં , હું ત્રણ ગુજરાતી ફિલ્મો ‘ ભવની ભવાઈ ’ , ‘કંકુ ’ અને ‘ ધાડ ’ વિશે વાત કરીશ, અને ગુજરાતી ફિલ્મોનાં પટ પર તેમનાં મહત્વ વિશે વાત કરવાનો નાનકડો પ્રયાસ કરીશ. ભવની ભવાઈ (૧૯૮૦) કેતન મહેતા દ્વારા દિગ્દર્શિત ફિલ્મ ‘ ભવની ભવાઈ ’ ૧૯૮૦માં પ્રદર્શિત થઈ હતી જે ધીરુબહેન પટેલના નાટક પર આધારિત હતી , અને જાતિવાદના મુદ્દા વિશે ખૂબ જ રસપ્રદ રીતે વાત કરે છે. આ ફિલ્મને રાષ્ટ્રીય અને આંતરરાષ્ટ્રીય સ્તર પર ખ્યાતિ પ્રાપ્ત થઈ છે. મારા માટે ફિલ્મનું સહુથી મહત્વનું દૃશ્ય શરૂઆતની ૬ સેકન્ડ્સમાં જ જોવા મળે છે; એ કહે છે, અસાઈત ઠાકોર અને બેર્તોલ બ્રેખ્તને સમર્પિત. આ એક ફ્રેમ ફિલ્મને ગુજરાતી અને વૈશ્વિક નાટ્યપરંપરા સાથે જોડી આપે છે. ‘ભવની ભવાઈ’ (દિ. મહેતા , ૧૯૮૦)       ફિલ્મ પોતાની વાત કહેવામાં ભવાઈ નાટ્યપરંપરાનો ઉપયોગ કરે છે, અને એક નવી જ નેરેટીવ પદ્ધતિ...

Mikhail Bakhtin and his Dialogic Imagination

Book: The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (1981) Author: M. M. Bakhtin Translated by: Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist Edited: Michael Holquist Austin & London: University of Texas Press "The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays" by Mikhail Bakhtin is already considered a classic not only from the perspective of literary genre but also as an important work on the philosophy of language. The present book contains the four essays: 1. Epic and Novel, 2. From the Prehistory of Novelistic Discourse, 3. Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel, 4. Discourse in the Novel and an Introduction and Glossary by the editor. The essays are a commentary on the  historical development of novel form and how it is different from the other literary form. His argument is that as the novel form is different from the other literary forms, we need a different type of stylistic and poetic analysis and dogmas for that in order to truly evaluate the Novel. He tries ...

"ધુળકી તારી માયા લાગી": એક અવલોકન

ફિલ્મ “ ધુળકી તારી માયા લાગી ” રાઠવા સમાજની એક યુવતી , ધુળકી , ની વાત કરે છે . આ ફિલ્મ ‘ રાઠ ’ વિસ્તાર તરીકે ઓળખતા છોટાઉદેપુર , પાવીજેતપુર , નસવાડી , બોડેલી , વગેરે જેવા ગામડાંઓમાં ખૂબ સફળ થઇ હતી . આ વિસ્તારના સિનેમાઘરોમાં , જ્યાં ફિલ્મ ફક્ત ત્રણ દિવસ ચાલતી , આ ફિલ્મ મહિનાઓ સુધી ચાલી . પરંતુ , મારા કેટલાક માહિતીદાતાઓના મત અનુસાર આ ફિલ્મ રાઠવા સમાજ વિષે ન હતી . તો પછી આ ફિલ્મ કેટલાક ચોક્કસ વિસ્તારોમાં જ આટલી સફળ કેમ થઇ ? પ્રસ્તુત પેપર એના કેટલાક કારણો વિષે વાત કરશે , અને ફિલ્મમાં ‘ રાઠવા ’ ઓળખ કઈ રીતે ઉભી કરવામાં આવી છે તેના વિષે વાત કરશે . સામાજીક રીતે પછાત વર્ગની ઉપલા વર્ગ તરફની ગતિ જે ફિલ્મની મુખ્ય કથાનો ગર્ભીતાર્થ છે , જે ફિલ્મનું અન્ય પાસુ રજુ કરે છે . તદુપરાંત , આપણે ફિલ્મ અને સમાજમાં પ્રસ્થાપિત માલીક્વર્ગ અને પીડીતવર્ગ વચ્ચેના પારસ્પરિક સંબંધોને પણ જોઈશું . ***                 માણસ સહુથી પહેલા એક માણસ છે , ધર્મ , જાતિ , વંશ , બધું જ તેની માનવતા અને માનવધર્મ સામે ગૌણ છે . આવો સરસ સંદેશો રજુ કરતી...